If you check old mails, I think that Stefan has already proposed a layout.
It needs to incorporate the antlibs directories (already in svn). Also, antidote is no longer supported, and should not be placed in svn - unless someone wants to maintain it. Peter Henri Yandell wrote:
To accompany the ongoing vote, I've setup a test Ant migration. https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/trunk ant I've made the huge assumption that the Ant TLP have only one codebase and haven't structured it in an umbrella way. I'm not sure if ant-antidote is live and needs to be a part of the migration too. SVN is hierarchical, so you'd end up with something like: ant/ core/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ antidote/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ Currently it's just: ant/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ Anyway, give it a try if you want and let me which strategy seems to make sense for Ant; ie) where do you want antidote? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]