If you check old mails, I think that Stefan has already proposed
a layout.

It needs to incorporate the antlibs directories (already in svn).
Also, antidote is no longer supported, and should not
be placed in svn - unless someone wants to maintain it.

Peter


Henri Yandell wrote:

To accompany the ongoing vote, I've setup a test Ant migration.

https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/

svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/trunk ant

I've made the huge assumption that the Ant TLP have only one codebase
and haven't structured it in an umbrella way. I'm not sure if
ant-antidote is live and needs to be a part of the migration too. SVN
is hierarchical, so you'd end up with something like:

ant/
 core/
   trunk/
   branches/
   tags/
  antidote/
   trunk/
   branches/
   tags/

Currently it's just:

ant/
 trunk/
 branches/
 tags/

Anyway, give it a try if you want and let me which strategy seems to
make sense for Ant; ie) where do you want antidote?

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to