I agree with Jess, but there is one piece missing - primitive types in generics. It would save a lot on autoboxing.
- Alexey. On 7/10/05, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > Actually I believe Java got it right as compared to C++ -- at least as > used in the ANSI C++ generic collections library. This library > generates big chunks of object code for *every* type thrown at it -- > irrespective of similarities in types. Just use: > ... -- Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com <http://gmail.com> home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
