> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Matt Benson wrote: > > >I can't imagine a scenario where BC would be > >compromised, but I'd be glad for an example. > > > >-Matt > > > > > > > I was thinking of the example with multiple import files with > the same projectname/targetname. > > example: > a.xml <project><target name="t"><echo>a.xml</echo></target></project> > b.xml <project><target name="t"><echo>b.xml</echo></target></project> > c.xml <project><target name="t"><echo>c.xml</echo></target></project> > build.xml > <project name="p"> > <import file="a.xml"/> > <import file="b.xml"/> > <import file="c.xml"/> > </project> > > In this case, ant 1.6.x (and my patch) will output. > > ant t > will output "a.xml" > ant p.t > will output "c.xml" >
Ok, your example confused me. What is p.t p is not imported, why would we have a p.t target? I do not understand why you get different answers for "p.t" and "t" is the same target on the same project (is it not?). Did you meant <project name="p"> on the imported? Then I see what you are saying. Although it is probably difficult to avoid given the fact that <import> is an executed task. But hey, more reason for adding 'as' since otherwise there is no way to disambiguate appart from changing the imported files. :-P Jose Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
