On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can count me in,
Will do, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > though I'm not 100% convinced of the depth required here. Neither am I. > What do we plan to provide in a library beyond what BouncyCastle has > implemented? Not sure whether we want to go beyond BouncyCastle at all. > Is our aim just to collect together some code to perform several > common tasks against that API? That's my current thinking, yes. Provide a stream-lined API that makes it easy to sign a file or verify a signature. If that API doesn't have any dependencies on --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
