Hello Matt,

OK with me, go ahead.

Cheers,

Antoine

> 
> --- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Matt,
> > 
> > Matt Benson wrote:
> > 
> > >>Hi all,
> > >>
> > >>There are some changes that need to be made to
> > >>Executor functionality before the interface is
> > >>released in 1.6.3 .  I was supposed to do this and
> > >>forgot before the RC was made (see bug 22901). 
> > I'd
> > >>like to get Antoine's blessing to make the
> > necessary
> > >>changes to HEAD and the 1.6 branch.
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > I have had a look at this attachment.
> >
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13904
> > referenced from
> >
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901
> > I would like to hear the opinion of other
> > committers. It sounds OK for me.
> 
> Also be aware that what I would be committing would
> not be that exact patch, but fulfills the spirit. 
> Alexey and I have coordinated on it.
> 
> > 
> > >Also, given what's coming in Ant 1.7 with
> > >ResourceCollections and set operations I would like
> > to
> > >modify the length task ever-so-slightly to NOT
> > exclude
> > >duplicate files.  Once again I apologize for
> > >compromising the release schedule.
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > Can you explain.
> 
> Okay... :)  when the current version of the length
> task operates on one or more filesets, my thought was
> that the length of a set of files is the length of its
> union and so I discarded duplicates.  In the
> ResourceCollection code there is explicit support for
> unions so I have tried to make all implementations
> keep duplicates with the exception of Union (and Path
> for BC).  Since length is a new task this time, I
> would rather not have to add ignoreDuplicates="false"
> (kludge) to preserve BC when I know about the issue
> already before length is ever released.  I hope this
> clears things up a little.
> 
> -Matt
> 
> > 
> > >-Matt
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > Cheers,
> > Antoine
> > 
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. 
> http://personals.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to