DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34138>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34138 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 19:58 ------- thanks for the good, fast, catch steve! I had (conveniently :) forgotten about the greedy/non-greedy compiler issues, that would crop up. :( Of course, there is another (enhancement-grade) fix: let's make the Depend task compute the dependencies that need to be rebuilt, and pass them to the compiler. On the other hand, different versions of compilers may have different dependency resolution algorithms (I believe I recall Jikes switched around a bit in the early years), and that could lead to non-replicable support calls as well, if the 'ant computed' and 'my compiler does this' dependency graphs don't match :( So, I am still a bit uncertain how to make ant work well out of the box in the 'best' way, without causing you headache with moving entry points and similar nonsense. Is the 'pre-set build.compiler' approach reasonable? In particular as Kaffe is likely to switch compilers around some more in the future (possibly back to kjc for generics, and then possibly to gcjx for more generics, and better gcj integration). cheers, dalibor topic -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
