--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why are we testing this on Unix? :)
>
> No idea. How about skipping the test (just like the
> Symlink test does
> nothing if not running on Unix) instead of trying to
> fix the path
> logic?
I think it's okay now. If we have any more problems
we can disable on Unix, but considering that the test
doesn't actually try to run any executables (so it CAN
work on Unix as far as it goes) it may be at least
marginally useful to keep Gump running it.
-Matt
>
> Stefan
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
