Asking infrastructure for their preferences would be good - maybe they want to kill bugzilla as cvs :-)
And IMO we could wait for starting the new project and bugtracking until they´ve solved the problems ... if it needs only a few weeks. But we should have a the same infrastructure for the whole ant project - same scm system for ant core and ant libs (svn) - same bugtracking for ant core and ant libs (whatever) Personally I´d prefer Bugzilla, because I am familiar with that. Jira would be complete new to me. Nearly the same as svn. But that´s a solvable problem. Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 10. März 2005 11:24 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: JIRA or Bugzilla? > > Hi, > > lurking on the infrastructure list shows that we do have stability > problems with JIRA and Tomcat on issues.apache.org, so right now I'd > prefer to stick with Bugzilla. > > Even without that I'd suggest we ask the infrastructure team what > they'd prefer us to use before we make any decision. > > Comments? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
