Kev Jackson wrote: ...
Forrest, sorry I thought that was for websites (sort of like velocity), but I haven't studied it properly....
When I've finished (and it's not as manual as it would first appear, although I could do with a transform html tables into docbook tabels script), the manual will be entirely in xml which can then be converted with a style task into html, pdf (via fop) or whatever.
That's what Forrest does.
Forrest now can generate a site using html as a source, even dirty html (it uses jtidy), so *if* the idea is to go with Forrest, I'd just not do the task of converting all the docs.
Besides, pure html is much easier to edit, as any decent html editor may do.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
