Kev Jackson wrote:
[snip]
h4 { color: #ffffff; background-color: #828DA6; }
td { background-color: eeeeee; color: 000000; }
pre { background-color: efefef; }
I would like to add a reference to the css file for the non-generated pages. It probablly should be a different stylesheet file that the antmanual.css as that one should also be used by the generated pages.
What do people think about this?
Different bg-color for headings and td? Is eeeeee like a soft grey?
They are various shades of blue - copied from the generated docs.
The generated docs are generated from the xdocs right?
Yes.
As an aside, I'm converting the current html in docs/manual to docbook format, (copying them, renaming them as foo.xml and then replacing all the damn tags), and I'm finding more than a few unclosed tags, spelling mistakes etc.
It may be better to fix the html pages first and then use a script to zap them into docbook format.
The manual pages will be contineously changing, so it will be difficult to keep the
docbook format in-sync otherwise.
Peter
The worst problem is with tables, but that's a problem with docbook/fop in general (always complains about the auto-layout)
Kev
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]