--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OR it may be that we should detect these
> conditions as
> > NOT being absolute pathnames on DOS.
>
> As with most Windows/DOS features I'm pretty much on
> the fence.
>
> To me it sounds as if marking paths "C:foo"
> non-absolute and modify
> resolveFile to deal with them the way you proposed
> normalizePath to do
> would be the better approach.
I think so too, especially since I opened up
FU.isAbsolutePath() to public access. Similarly with
Netware... I have worked with older versions of
Netware, and on those VOLUME:PATH or VOLUME:\PATH are
equivalent but not absolute. VOLUME: is relative to
the current server. So SERVER\VOLUME:(\)?PATH is
absolute, as is "driveletter-colon-separator." Can
anyone update my knowledge of Netware file
specification conventions?
Thanks,
Matt
>
> Stefan
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
