> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > the reason I stuck in the task, is it lets a task add its own > bindToOwner implementation, to do extra binding. If you put it in the > parent, then the bound task doesnt get a look in. > > Make sense?
Not really ;-) Do you have any example of such a thing? Sounds like me like it breaks encapsulation, no? A task should not have to know whether it's used directly or not in my view. Then again I tend to button things down tight as a habit. It always easier to loosen things a bit later, than the reverse, especially with Ant's BC requirements. All that said, thanks for doing this. You're new bindToOwner() does help encapsulation. We can now easily copy more attributes in just one place in the future. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
