On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's some mention of a hash called Whirlpool[1] that sounds like > it isn't based on the same bit hash as MD5 and SHA-0/1
The GNU JCE provider seems to have it[1]. > For ant 1.6.3, a mention that it's not safe to use checksum, At least for stuff that's important enough that anybody would want to spend enough CPU cycles on faking the digest. The number of cycles required to break SHA1 is still significant. Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-crypto/manual/The-IMessageDigest-Interface.html#The%20IMessageDigest%20Interface --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
