DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 01:21 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Ken, you may not see the pb since <replace> does not make use of the relative > filenames, just the files. Try to reflect on an example with <copy>, and were > should the files be copied to... --DD I just plucked <replace> randomly. The point is that what I described seems to provide a sane, describable semantic for a composite fileset. I can't see where it fails to meet the expectations for a fileset. If I was using it for javac, I would still get c/foo.java and x/bar.java and that should work, right? And for <copy> it would copy things to c/foo.java and x/bar.java, right? I'm not trying to sound overconfident here, but it all seems to hang together to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
