DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32977>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32977 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-07 00:24 ------- I see your point. Since you're merely testing for the existence of a file, that's unfortunate. But then, if webapps/wsrf was in the same dir as the build file, itself in the root dir, your proposed change would make the condition be true, when you expect it 3 directories down. Don't you also find this disturbing, that you pick up something that your build file explicitly and statically states should be 3 directories down (or up, depending...) and is in fact collocated? One way to deal with this would be to compute the actual filename the way you want prior to test it in the <condition>, using a small <script> or a smal custom task. You'd bypass the usual filename resolution code in Ant and use directly new File(dir, path) which worked as you want. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
