DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-06 20:15 ------- Logically a set can be composed of other sets. I have two filesets that I want to compose into one. The meaning is quite clear. Why can't I do it? (Yes, I could (I think) take my two file sets, create independent patternsets for each of them, and then create a new fileset with the two patternsets. I think. Can I put more than one patternset in a fileset? Ah, no, but I could create a nested patternset (thanks to Erik) and then create a fileset from that. Which doubles the number of XML artifacts I have and adds to the complexity, not to mention that I must name each patternset and fileset, making my namespace bigger. But it would work, I think.) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
