Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Before you get too excited by the opportunities (and yes, <junit> has > collected quite a bit of historic cruft) - we are not going to remove a > single attribute or nested element of any existing task, since backwards > compatibility is an extremely important asset around Ant.
You're right and I'm aware of it. But why not create a junit2 and made junit deprecated ? Wasn't it done for javadoc long time ago ? I think another way to convince you may be to find many bugs in the current implementation ;) Regard -- Yves Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
