On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) this attribute is good.
> however, it is only really usefull in combination with the
> iftrue attribute, or with ant-contrib "if" task
Agreed. Or IOW, I don't think it is that useful without an if-task
like structure.
> 2) a default value for the element is good. The default value should
> be in the declaration, but it is ok to have it the body of the
> macrodef.
+1 for having it in the declaration.
> 3) this sounds good if a little stange initially.
Agreed on both counts (sounds useful and strange).
4) I don't like since I don't want to see the @{...} constructs leak
out of the <macrodef> body at all.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
