DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32638>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32638 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 17:41 ------- Would that work? There wouldn't be any textual substitution by macroSubs, and <my:sequential> would know nothing about contents.element.set since not in the eral Project properties, and if you did put it in the project properties, then we have the usual tmp/immutable property issue. The properly pull it off, you'd need the notion of a proper AntContext, the macro instance one on top of the normal project one, no? That's why the ifTrue condition works will in this case, since it sidesteps the issue by letting macrodef do the macroSubs, and evaluate the result as a boolean. --DD -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
