On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Why do you introduce an additional abstract method? >> >>Wouldn't it be easier to place the logic of your eval into execute() >>directly and force subclasses to implement eval() just as they'd do >>as plain conditions anyway? >> >> > I wanted to separate the property handing logic from the conditon > code.
That's why I suggested to place it into execute 8-) Thanks for pulling the task. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
