Let doesn't scare me off too much, as it reminds me of Standard ML. let x=lambda(f) ==>f+3;
And Basic, funnily enough: LET X=X=1; I think if we use Let, then we are starting to look like a language with the notion of 'environment' as lisp engines call it. In which case the issue is not so much the terminology, but the formality: we ought to come up with a rigorous, documented, defensible model for property scoping. Otherwise, well <localproperty> makes a lot of sense too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
