IMO we should have the SVN tasks. Its too important, like the CVS section. Jan
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Montag, 20. September 2004 10:49 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: RE: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? > > I am also +1 for (3). > I think there are more than one set of optional tasks that > could fit the picture of having its own separate development cycle > and antlib subprojects would be the natural place for them. > > And talking about SVN, is there anyone interested on having > a full set of tasks (antlib) for SVN? Just as we have for > other VCS. Or shall we ask the SVN community to provide one? > > Jose Alberto > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 20 September 2004 07:51 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? > > > > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On the same reasons I would say (3). Especially we had > spoken about > > > breaking Ant into modules and moving to SVN ... (last > year at your > > > home, Stefan :) > > > > Is it really that long ago 8-) > > > > I'll wait a few more days to gather comments and may provide > > a simple proposal for an antlib subproject. > > > > Stefan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
