I am also +1 for (3). I think there are more than one set of optional tasks that could fit the picture of having its own separate development cycle and antlib subprojects would be the natural place for them.
And talking about SVN, is there anyone interested on having a full set of tasks (antlib) for SVN? Just as we have for other VCS. Or shall we ask the SVN community to provide one? Jose Alberto > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20 September 2004 07:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? > > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On the same reasons I would say (3). Especially we had spoken about > > breaking Ant into modules and moving to SVN ... (last year at your > > home, Stefan :) > > Is it really that long ago 8-) > > I'll wait a few more days to gather comments and may provide > a simple proposal for an antlib subproject. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
