--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > By user visible I meant that ant -cp x:y:z would > not be supported by > the > > ant[.bat]. By support, I mean x:y:z replacing > CLASSPATH in the > > java call. It would be a nice to have, but would > need support by the > > the script (sh and bat), in detecting -cp, setting > LOCALCLASSPATH > > and CLASSPATH correctly. > > > > For the point of view of Launcher.java, the > behaviour would be as you > > describe, except that Launcher.java would make > sure that only one -cp > is > > used. > > I guess I'm a little slow today, as this is still > not clear to me. > > Let me put it differently: > > 1) I agree that if the user has a CLASSPATH set, we > should not > add all the JARs from any directory in the > CLASSPATH. > > 2) When the user calls Ant with -lib dir1:dir2, all > JARs in > dir1 and dir2 are automatically added to Ant's > classpath, > exactly as it is now, i.e. full B.C. > > if implementing (1) means adding a -cp, that's > great, but only > if (2) remains available and retains its current > behavior. --DD
This is what I understood Peter to mean. -Matt __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]