DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30912>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30912 misleading doc on file name mappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[pathconvert] doesn't |misleading doc on file name |support the new built-in |mappers |mapper type names | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-30 12:55 ------- The doc about mappers is not very clear on this but the new build-in mapper type names are not supported by all (or any at the moment) ant tasks. The way to use them is as nested elements within a mapper element, for example pathcovert is: <pathconvert ....> <path .../> <mapper> <packagemapper .../> </mapper> </pathconvert> I am leaving the issue open with a new title. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
