On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This allows to bypass the target override, and thus bypass whatever > the overridden target does.
Right. But I already can bypass it if the target is overridden since I get the aliased name then. If this type of bypassing is wrong, we shouldn't allow it in any way. I don't have a real world use-case, granted, my major reason is consistency - I want to be able to write depends="foo.bar" and not care whether it has been overridden or not. Stefan PS: > I'm not -1, and even then it'd be non-binding, but I don't > understand the need for this. This isn't a vote at all, so binding or not wouldn't matter. Outside of the legal world, your opinion here certainly matters, whether you are a committer or not. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
