Add to that, the fix for RuntimeExceptions to be converted into BuildExceptions.
We talked about it, but never finally settled it and do it. Jose Alberto > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 27 May 2004 16:08 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Ant 1.6.2 release? > > > > I would like to do: > > 1) implicit element for macrodef > move from head to 1.6 branch > > 2) DynamicElementNS > move from head to 1.6 branch > > 3) Allow nested elements discovered by refection on to be > in the ant default namespace uri as well as the task's/types > namespace uri > (the current rules are difficult to follow and make build scripts > look like line noise :-( aka xml ns hell) > > <ac:for param="file"> > <ac:path> > <ac:fileset dir="${test.dir}/mains" includes="*.c,*.cpp"/> > <ac:pathelement > path="${test.dir}/probeoffline/probeoffline.cpp"/> > <ac:pathelement path="src/shell/probesh.cpp"/> > <ac:pathelement path="test/shell/TestProbesh.cpp"/> > <ac:pathelement path="test/probed/TestProbed.cpp"/> > <ac:pathelement path="test/pcapanon/pcapanon.cpp"/> > </ac:path> > <ac:sequential> > <compile-exec-file file="@{file}"/> > </ac:sequential> > </ac:for> > > 4) Fix the Xml validation with scheam > currently the unit test does not enable validation > see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=107657690216179&w=2 > > 5) Fix or at least document support for tomcat 5.0 jsp > > Other things - maybe after 1.6.2 > > 1) the antlibresolve task > 2) concat support for binary files > 3) fix some classloading issues: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28782 > this does two things, a) set the parent classloader in > createClassloader() > - most likely a good thing and b) search parent > classloaders for > resources > - most likely this will cause BC problems. > 4) search paths for the import task > 5) add delete on exit feature to the <delete> task - needed > to antlib devl > on windows > 6) add a do not follow symbolic links option to <delete> task > > Peter > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >On Thu, 27 May 2004, Ben Sommerville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>About a month ago there was some discussion of a 1.6.2 release. Has > >>this been shelved? If not is there a timeframe? > >> > >> > > > >Unfortunately it looks to have slipped again, thanks for pushing. > > > >Dear committers, do you think we can get a list of "must-get-fixed" > >reports by some fixed date - say end of next week? After > that we could > >freeze features and start rolling a first beta as soon as > the list is > >"done". > > > >Stefan > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
