At 04:06 AM 5/19/2004, you wrote:
DynamicConfigurator is NS unaware.
(This was for BC reasons, in ant1.6betaX).

There is work in progress to make
a DynamicConfiguratorNS  -
see:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28426

One question:
should the interface give the ns prefix or the qualified name,
ie:
     Object createDynamicElement(
       String uri, String prefix, String localName) throws BuildException;

or

Object createDynamicElement(
String uri, String qualifiedName, String localName) throws BuildException;


The second form may be more useful for talking to Dom.

Peter


I think the second form can also be passed directly into
ComponentHelper's various APIs without a side call to
'genComponentName'. So the second form gets my vote...



Wascally Wabbit wrote:

Hi All,

Just wondering if DynamicConfigurator's "createDynamicElement"
will be supplemented for namespace-bound elements? Perhaps a
new interface that extends DynamicConfigurator? Currently I
cannot get the full context for the element so "a:thing" is
passed in as "thing"...which ComponentHelper cannot find.


The Wabbit


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Wabbit




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to