On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> Because the answer "Why aren't all the selectors being >>> types?" is equally valid. Which one gets typedefed as "and"? >>> >> Fair enough, are <and/> and <or/> the only ones in limbo? > > and <not/>.
as well as <contains/>. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
