Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But on reflection, it may be better to use the <chainmapper> element
in this case, inside an implicit <compositemapper> aka <mapper>
So we seem to agree.
Agreed! Peter
Stefan
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
