I cannot see any really major changes from 1.6 to HEAD so would prefer 1.6.2 as name. And if we can get rid of the local 16_BRANCH I would be happy - holding these two trees partially in sync is not easy :-)
Jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Why are we having the branch after all? (was Re: cvs commit: > ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html) > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Or should the 15390 be applied to 1.6 as well? > > Given the amount of new features we are adding to the 1.6 branch, this > has IMHO far outgrown a maintenance branch. The difference between > the 1.6 branch and CVS HEAD is very small and if soemthing ends up on > the branch or not is purely arbitrary - I cannot see a theme here. > > Maybe we should rather release a 1.7 from CVS HEAD instead of 1.6.2? > Or release from CVS HEAD and call it 1.6.2? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
