DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28444>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28444 Import: Target Handling Bug ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-17 19:32 ------- Mike: I have been playing around with similar concepts for days... however, in this case, knowing that B imports A, C would merely import B. Or, had you imported B before A, thus defining x first, all would have been well. OR, had C defined x, that would have been okay too. I also thought it might be nice if there were a way to specify that imported targets would always be added with their "super" name, but I am undecided whether it's an entirely good idea... guess we'll see if Peter or anyone else has an opinion on this one... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
