DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24697>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24697 The JUnit plugin forks once for each test suite [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.7 |1.6.2 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-15 10:10 ------- Dominique, I always knew that propertyset, sync or subant must have been written by somebody else ;-) Back to the patch. I'll take the basic idea but will have to change quite a bit of it. In particular I can't simply change the signature of the setFork method to accept something else but a boolean since that would break backwards compatibility. I'll probably introduce a new attribute. The alternative would be to extend the "String loses vs. more advanced" logic in IntrospectionHelper to pick setFork(SomeClass) over setFork(boolean). It certainly shouldn't affect the generated XML output and thus junitreport will be save. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
