> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I see this is a two liner, that even puts back in commented out code... > >What's the problem with checking it in? > >When Ant 1.6.2 being built with it ;-) > > > It was discussed for ant 1.6.0, but was voted down: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=106848848930806&w=2 > > (option c).
Well, doesn't my use case, very valid IMHO, clearly shows that it is indeed necessary? I don't really care what the XML rules are myself, as long as the use cases I bring forward can be used/implemented. Given the new light my use of <macrodef> has brought up, which again should work IMHO, I'm asking for a re-vote, or an alternative solution to enable that use case. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
