DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27007>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27007 subant task fails even if failonerror="false" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-02-18 10:50 ------- I think we are getting into a backward compatibility redhearing here. I see no reason why people would be even thinking such code should be supported. So to me this is a bug fix, nothing else. It make no sense to me to create a new safeExecute() method since ALL tasks all over will override execute() which means obtaining the "correct" behaviour will have an extremely high cost of conversion, which eventually will defeat the whole purpose of the fix. In any case, the fix should probably be not in Task.execute(), but in Task.perform() to be exact on the catch block for RuntimeException. If you look at the code in there it throws the original exception as is, instead, I think, it should catch Throwable (I am being bold here), and convert it into a BuildException before doing what is doing now. Task.perform() is what the ANT engine calls, and if someone wants to see the raw result, it can always call Task.execute() directly. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
