> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 December 2003 17:59 > Subject: Re: XML Namespace avoids collision between xml vocabularies was > RE: a comment about xml namespace > If you are interested in this kind of thing, point your browser at > http://1060.org and d/l a build of NetKernel -preferably 2.1 when it > ships shortly. This is definitely a generic XML processor engine which > does plenty much magic, like (in v2.1) autobinding a database select to > an XML document for later xformation.
[Jim Fuller] interesting, will have a look... > Returning to Ant, we are a build tool, not a generic workflow engine > -even if a lot of the XML workflow/PI stuff at the w3c shows ant > experience. The problem of getting project to ship roughly what was > asked for, on or before the date promised, is hard enough without > introducing more complexity [Jim Fuller] uhhh, I just want an xml document to be used by multiple processors, not have Ant *be* the generic processor. I always assume that data lives longer then the applications that generate or manipulate them....oh well as I said, I will leave this thread asis, for the time being. I need to spend a few days looking at Ant internals, before I comment any further. Regards, Jim Fuller --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
