DOM does not give you access to the NS prefix, at least when you create an
element from the document. Why would you need the prefix? Granted, even XSL
uses the prefix in attribute values (xs:string), but it's bad XML according
to EffectiveXML and others... The namespace prefix is the
business of the XML file writer, not the XML application. --DD
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Lenz
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: 12/12/2003 4:12 AM
Subject: Re: DynamicConfigurator namespace problem
Am 12.12.2003 um 10:23 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, either add DynamicConfiguratorNS or revert the change I made
>> yesterday to DynamicConfigurator.
>
> I'm more inclined to add DynamicConfiguratorNS.
Same here. Proposed interface:
public class DynamicConfiguratorNS {
public Object createDynamicElement(
String namespaceURI,
String prefix,
String localName);
public void setDynamicAttribute(
String namespaceURI,
String prefix,
String localName,
String value);
}
Where namespaceURI, prefix and localName have the same semantics as in
DOM Level 2:
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/dom2-javadoc/org/w3c/dom/Node.html
I don't think this interface should extend DynamicConfigurator. The
only effect would be that implementors also would need to implement the
old two pair of methods.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher Lenz
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
