Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This change breaks our old friend <macrodef/> which uses
DynamicConfigurator to implement elements and attributes of the
macros.
Does than mean that we'll need a DynamicConfiguratorNS in 1.6 to make
macrodef work? In order to avoid breaking backwards compatibility
in DynamicConfigurator too badly, that is.
Yes, either add DynamicConfiguratorNS or revert the change I made yesterday to DynamicConfigurator.
Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
