On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> BTW, we could probably change <csc> to default to mcs as executable >> if not running on Windows, that would make build files easier to >> port. > > +1
Done. >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>+1; would be nice if we could have a nant listener that would feed >>>into Ant's reporting levels. >> I don't think it is possible to write on without making it LGPLed >> at the same time. > > that side of things would go into nant or an sf project; ant side > would just parse the stream. OK, I see. > Actually it makes me think of a broader want of mine -the ability to > run a forked or remote and and have log info chain across the wire > -messages, exception traces, &c. Yep, something similar has been started by Stephane for JUnit (running tests in a separate VM but sending the results directly to Ant without "tunneling" through logfiles. > This is all 1.7-timeframe stuff, but could be very cool. Sure. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
