DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942 Addition of a local property ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-23 06:38 ------- Just wanted to mention that the patch (9164) fails on defaults.properties when patching against the 1.6 Branch. Version 1.154 is used to patch against, but it isn't tagged with the ANT_16_BRANCH tag and the one on the 1.6 branch doesn't define the "nice" task so <patch> returns an error for it and skips applying the patch. Everything else seems to work ok. Oh, one other thing. In order to compile Local.java, I had to modify the following from this: PropertyHelper.getPropertyHelper( getProject()).addLocalProperty(name, value); to this: PropertyHelper.getPropertyHelper( getProject()).addLocalProperty(name, value, false); The reason is that Local seems to have been built against the older patch (8631 or 8652) where the addLocalProperty() method took a String and an Object, but not also a boolean as the newest patch adds. After all that, I built the modified 1.6 Branch and tested my <macrodef> that sets a property, but uses <local> to keep the property local. It works great!!!! Is this going to get in soon? It would be nice to play with a more officially applied patch and get other users to test it out before a 1.6beta3 release. Jake --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
