What about {$x}? Or is it too close to a typo for a regular property?
way too confusing, IMHO. And departs significant from our "pattern"
which seems to be
identifier type marker, open curly brace, identifier, close curly brace
The more I look at this, the clearer my clear choice becomes for @{x}.
It maintains the ant "pattern" of identifier naming while being quite
significantly different in an important way so that visual confusion
will be unlikely, even when the script writer is tired :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Shatzer, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:09 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
substitutions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
> substitutions
>
> > [ ] as $(x)
> > [ ] as @{x}
>
> either one works for me - as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
What about {$x}? Or is it too close to a typo for a regular property?
-- Larry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
