On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One oddity is that the implementation of elements is now > exposed.
Yes, I see you've "fixed" the specific <for> case by now, but it remains a little strange. But then again it doesn't, as the version which uses addTask is open for polymorphism while the addSequential is not - as far as Ant's intorspection rules are concerned. We'll have to explain which elements are open for polymorphism and which are not in the future a lot. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
