On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - should the default uri be "antlib:org.apache.tools.ant" to > be consistent with other antlib uri's
it would only be consistent if there was an antlib.xml in the ant package. I wouldn't mind having one that was restricted to types and tasks for now. > - should the uris of introspection discovered nested elements be > the same as the containing task I'm not sure I understand. I think you mean whether <x:foo> <bar> </x> would be associated with foo's or the URI that belongs to the default namespace. I'd apply the namespace rules here. I.e. if you want bar to be looked up in foo's URI space, you'd have to write <x:foo xmlns="..."> <bar> </x> Maybe I'm not understanding what you mean. > * antlib support > - should <typedef resource="x"/> look for all instances of x or > just the first one. > + I think it should. you think it should what? 8-) Could you elaborate on the impact? Up until now it would have picked up only the first resource, so if we change that now, it might be backwards incompatible (though that's probably extremely unlikely). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
