DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020 [PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-15 20:12 ------- The comment in the middle of the post linked below also points to a user desire for access control on targets, or in this case ways to work around needing it... even if it isn't going to make it into the 1.6 can it go into 1.7? That way we can start finding out why what I wrote is wrong (or not)? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=106623431723810&w=2 Also to keep info available in one place, I would like to note that some other relavant discussion of this RFE occured on the dev list here under the heading of one of the duplicates: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&w=2&r=1&s=Bug+23397&q=t --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
