You are correct. I apologize for not having read the original
enhancement more carefully. I have submitted a new enhancement
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450) that solves
the problem I have described.
Sean Rohead
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:36 am, Sean Rohead wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
>
> But I'm still confused about the reluctance to embrace the original
> proposal.
The original proposal does not solve your problem. It adds a property
which
changes to the target name currently being executed. If you put this in
your
lib target, for instance, you would always execute the lib target in
your
sub-builds.
Conor
------
