On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> I was also wondering,why we had both optional.jar and its
> subcomponents.

When I split up optional.jar, I kept the original just to be sure we
had something to fall back to.

Having optional.jar and all the smaller pieces would sure cause a lot
of confusion.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to