>Von: Per Olesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Freitag, 19. September 2003 21:23 > >I've often missed a task for generating a ejb clientjar. Ant already includes >a "ejbjar" task, but - as far as I know - no way of generating a ejb >clientjar from a generic ejbjar as input/source. > If this is a standard J2EE requirement, and if the task is really not covered yet, then it is certainly in the scope of ant.
>I hereby volunteer to write one myself ! > Contributions are always welcome. >Should I start by sending a description on this list of how I would implement >it (how it should work) or should I make a bugzilla report as a request for >enhancement and then grab it myself (may I even grab an issue? I have not >contributed to ant before). > It is OK that you discuss on the list how you want to implement the task. Maybe there are also some J2EE discussion groups where you can also get some ideas. When you have something ready, a report in bugzilla with the new files attached to it as a tar or a tar.gz + a patch file made with cvs diff -u for changes to existing code is what we like. Please include documentation and test cases. >I can also just write it like I would like it to work, and then submit the >patch for it. But then I first get your valuable input after I've done the >implementation. > >Also: Should I develop against 1.6? I can see that there is a proposal for >starting a release-plan for 1.6. Might not make it into 1.6 then. Is there a >2.0 on the way? (there is a 2.0 name in bugzilla). > You should definitively develop against CVS_HEAD which is currently also ant1.6alpha and will soon become ant1.7alpha. There is no 2.0 on the way. Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
