On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Free for non-commercial use."
Is not acceptable for us, of course. Ant is free for any use. > "Developers: Printf for Java is distributed as fully functional, > non-expiring, nag-free, shareware." Same here. > So I introduced an interface for abstracting the implementation. Hmm, I wonder if there'd be any restrictions on that interface. > Thoughts? Is it really worth the trouble? If so, it may even be easier to write a sprintf library from scratch and put it into jakarta commons. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
