On 29 Jul 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some tasks rely on the DFS ordering getIncludedXYZ used to provide
I'm not sure whether we want to provide this as the sort order has never been documented. The recent changes in DirectoryScanner could lead to a situation in which A/C will be returned before A/B, I don't think this is a big issue but patched it for completeness. The change to ZipScanner in turn is necessary as getIncludedDirectories could return A/B before returning A itself - this could cause trouble within Zip where the code assumes that the parents of a given directory have been added before the directory itself[1]. The change to Resource is merely cosmetic. Stefan Footnotes: [1] Not strictly true, the code will ensure that the parents have been added before, but may do the wrong thing WRT to Unix permissions once my next patch to Zip is committed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
