On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:03 am, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hi, > > I am concerned about the Perforce bugs, about which a lot of people have > complained. >
The problem is that there are lots of bug fixes to Ant in HEAD that can be back ported to 1.5. These are useful for many people. The more that goes in the more likely it is that we need a beta, etc. If these are must-haves then I'd rather push harder on 1.6 to get them out there and live with the javah pain on the current 1.5.3. > Can you also mention a time frame for 1.6 parallel to the release plan for > 1.5.4 I am eager to see the new tasks and the bug fixes evaluated by the > users, and hopefully benefitting to them. At the moment I have issues with <import>. The importing within imports is not right, at the moment, I think. Also I think we need to give <antlib> a bit of a stretch :-) I'd like to see that happen first. For me a first 1.6 beta is still about a month or two away. > > After the initial release of 1.6, I foresee a long period of bug fixing. :( > But I like fixing bugs personally :-) Agreed (on both counts). Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
